Introduction For the final project each student will be submitting a letter to a
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
Introduction
For the final project each student will be submitting a letter to an elected official. This peer response assignment allows students to submit rough publishs of their letters in order to receive feedback from student peers.
Your Tasks
Task 1
Review the tasks listed in the Project: Letter to an Elected Official page. This can be found in the last module of this course.
Task 2
You will complete a rough publish of your letter. You only need to submit the letter, not the project reflection. Points for this task will be based solely on whether or not you submitted a publish. 10 points
Task 3
This assignment requires peer review. You will be assigned to view 2 of your classmates’ assignments. Names will remain anonymous. You will provide any comments, suggestions, comments, and concerns that you have regarding the peer’s rough publish. Please use the attached rubric as a basis for your feedback. Grades given by students will not be accounted for in the final submission of the project at the end of this course.
This task is worth 20 points, 10 per peer review completed.
Unsure how to submit a peer review? Canvas Community has a guide with a step-by-step explanation on peer review submission Links to an external site..
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLetter- Content
50 to >42.0 ptsExcellent
The student demonstrates a well-developed focus, thorough points of development, and a logical pattern of organization of ideas and concepts.
42 to >34.0 ptsAdequate
The student demonstrates noticeable focus, adequate points of development, and a noticeable pattern of organization of ideas and concepts.
34 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
The student demonstrates no clear focus, no clear development, and no clear organizational pattern of ideas and concepts.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLetter- StructurePlease refer to the How to Write a Letter to Elected Officials page when constructing your letter. This page can be found in the last module of the course.
10 ptsFull Credit
The student has completely followed the guidelines provided in the How to Write a Letter to an Elected Official page.
5 ptsPartial Credit
The student has partially followed the guidelines in the How to Write a Letter to an Elected Official page; however, some elements are missing.
0 ptsNo Credit
The student did not follow the guidelines provided in the How to Write a Letter to an Elected Official page.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLetter- WritingThis includes grammar, punctuation, and syntax. Is the writing consistent with the English language?
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent
Learner demonstrates exemplary accomplishment of the following tasks: 1. Consistently appropriate and precise language for the assignment. 2. Consistently clear divisions between the writer’s voice and the sources used to support claims. 3. Consistent and clear use of standard American English in grammar and punctuation
8 to >5.0 ptsAcceptable
Learner demonstrates adequate accomplishment of the following tasks: 1. Somewhat precise language is used. 2. Irregular divisions between the writer’s voice and the sources are used to support claims. 3. Evident lapses in use of standard American English in grammar and punctuation.
5 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Learner demonstrates incomplete attempt to address the following tasks: 1. Frequent lapses in concrete language. 2. Consistent irregularity in divisions between the writer’s voice and the sources used to support claims. 3. Consistent lapses in use of standard American English in grammar and punctuation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflectionStudents are required to provide a brief reflection of the letter writing process and the project as a whole.
30 ptsFull Credit
Student has provided a project reflection and it meets the required word count.
10 ptsPartial Credit
Student has provided a reflection but it does not meet the minimum 50 word count.
0 ptsNo Credit
Student did not include a reflection of the project.
30 pts
