Make sure plagiarism doesn’t exceed more than 20%, please. Review the patient’s
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
Make sure plagiarism doesn’t exceed more than 20%, please.
Review the patient’s TB questionnaire. (Page 1) (Page 2) page 1 and 2 attached
Conduct an evidence-based literature search to identify the most recent standards of care/treatment modalities from peer-reviewed articles and professional association guidelines (www.guideline.go Links to an external site.). https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/index.html
These articles and guidelines can be referenced, but not directly copied into the clinical case presentation. Cite a minimum of three resources.
Answer the following questions:
What is the transmission and pathophysiology of TB?
What are the clinical manifestations?
After considering this scenario, what are the primary identified medical concerns for this patient?
What are the primary psychosocial concerns?
What are the implications of the treatment regimen, as far as likelihood of compliance and outcomes? Search the Internet to research rates of patient compliance in treatment of TB, as well as drug resistant TB.
Identify the role of the community clinic in assisting patients, particularly undocumented patients, in covering the cost of TB treatment. What resources exist for TB treatment in community health centers around the United States? Compare the cost for treatment between, subsidized as it would be for a community health center, and unsubsidized.
What are the implications of TB for critical care and advanced practice nurses?
The use of medical terminology and appropriate graduate-level writing is expected.
Your paper should be 4 pages (excluding cover page and reference page).
Your resources must include research articles as well as reference to non-research evidence-based guidelines.
Use Current APA Style to format your paper and to cite your sources. Your source(s) should be integrated into the paragraphs. Use internal citations pointing to evidence in the literature and supporting your ideas. You will need to include a reference page listing those sources. Cite a minimum of three resources.
Rubric:
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
50 to >43.5 ptsMeets Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all questions. Makes keen observations, making note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions.
43.5 to >37.5 ptsApproaching Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most questions. Makes occasional note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions.
37.5 to >29.5 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for most questions. Fails to address essential information provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion.
29.5 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
50 to >43.5 ptsMeets Expectations
Makes insightful, clear and accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
43.5 to >37.5 ptsApproaching Expectations
Makes mostly accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
37.5 to >29.5 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations, although attempts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
29.5 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
35 to >30.45 ptsMeets Expectations
Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
30.45 to >26.25 ptsApproaching Expectations
Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
26.25 to >20.65 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
20.65 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
15 to >13.05 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
13.05 to >11.25 ptsApproaching Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.
11.25 to >8.85 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
8.85 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.
15 pts
Total Points: 150
