Please read the proposal and write this publish 1 based on the proposal attached.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
Please read the proposal and write this publish 1 based on the proposal attached. Please also read the feedback on the proposal and make adjustments. This assignment is only publish 1 for the term paper. The instruction for this assignment is listed below.
In this assignment you will write a research paper, analyzing a Global Affairs Theory and Case/ issue / program / policy drawing lessons from one country context for other countries. Sample topics could include pandemic handling by the World Health Organization, the International Labour Organization’s Better Work program in Cambodia, Non-Governmental Organization anti-corruption efforts in Thailand, World Bank rule of law efforts in Peru, UN Population Fund (UNFPA) population policy in a given country or International Criminal Court effectiveness. The paper should cover four areas: the content of the policy or program that interests you (including a literature review); an analysis of its effectiveness; a series of recommendations on how it might be improved; and principles and lessons for other countries undertaking initiatives in the same policy area. The paper should be grounded in an argument (a “thesis”) that is stated clearly in the introduction and that anchors the entire essay.
The paper must be a new project for you. It cannot be a modification of a piece you have written for work, a prior course or a concurrent course.
In the paper you should offer the reader a clear exposition of the content of the policy or program that exists. If you were writing on pandemic handling by WHO, for instance, you would need to specify when the WHO began to combat the pandemic actively, what strategies have been used, what initiatives have been undertaken and how much money has been spent.
You should then assess the impact of these policies and programs. If possible, identify quantifiable measures, and then examine whether outcomes can be connected to the policy. For instance, have pandemic deaths declined to any great extent since the WHO began actively combatting the pandemic? If so, by how much? And to what extent can this be attributed to government policy rather than other factors such as international policy attention, and/or natural patterns in the epidemiology of the disease?
Following this analysis, you should offer recommendations on how the policy or program can be improved. What are the shortcomings in WHO pandemic policy? Have WHO authorities failed to target particular vulnerable groups? If so, how might the WHO rectify the situation? Have aspects of the pandemic been neglected by WHO?
Finally, you should draw out general lessons based on the WHO’s experience with the issue. WHO has had a mixed bag of successes (AIDS) and failures (Ebola). Other International Organizations (Doctors Without Borders) took a very different approach on Ebola. What did MSF do well that WHO might copy or modify? What does the WHO experience demonstrate about effective pandemic policy? How might other international organizations avoid any shortcomings in the WHO?
The paper must be around 2,500 words, including footnotes and bibliography. Remember that there is no correlation between the length of a paper and the quality of the paper. Being too verbose (i.e., exceeding the above limits) will not improve your grade. Indeed, concision is appreciated.
The publish should be written in essay rather than bullet-point form, with an introduction and a conclusion. You need to include a bibliography, employ footnotes and use at least 10 substantive sources (i.e. scholarly works or major reports that are refereed: newspaper and magazine articles do not count as one of the 10).
I will evaluate the paper based on the following criteria:
1. A sharp and clear argument that is well-defended, anchors the entire paper and conveys the significance of the case for other countries, settings and Global Affairs Theory and Case.
2. Lucid presentation of the policy or program with respect to the Global Affairs Theory and Case. It should be clear to the reader what has been attempted in the country you choose in the context of the Global Affairs Theory and Case.
3. Sharp assessment of the impact of the policy or program in the context of the Global Affairs Theory and Case, using appropriate indicators.
4. Justifiable recommendations on how to improve the policy or program with respect to the Global Affairs Theory and Case. Do not just list your suggestions: explain why these and not other courses of action are the most appropriate measures to take.
5. Fluid style. The paper should flow smoothly from one section to the next and read like a narrative.
6. Full documentation: Inclusion of a bibliography with at least 10 substantive sources that are refereed, and careful footnoting. It does not matter what kind of footnote format you employ as long as it conforms to standard scholarly practices.
7. The use of clear language, free of spelling and grammatical errors. For those students whose native language is not English I will be more lenient on this criterion.
