Dear Freelancer, please complete the task below, you don’t need to write a paper
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
Dear Freelancer, please complete the task below, you don’t need to write a paper, you need to evaluate papers –
You will have to write a paper for this course, so I would like you to see a really bad example and a really good example of what the teacher expects. You need to give a letter grade to 2 old student papers based on the rubric. Then you need to evaluate one or the other based on the criteria of the rubric.
INITIAL INSTRUCTIONS1) Introduction – Introduce your artwork and thoroughly describe when/where it is from and what it would have been used for. Include your ideas about how it relates to the concept of power. The last sentence of this paragraph is your THESIS SENTENCE (tell me what you are arguing)
2) Body Paragraph 1 – Describe and explain in detail one aspect of the artwork that conveys ideas of power. Include at least one reliable source to support your idea.
3) Body paragraph 2 – Describe and explain in detail a second aspect of the artwork that conveys ideas of power. Include at least one reliable source to support your idea.
4) Body Paragraph 3 – Describe and explain in detail a third aspect of the artwork that conveys ideas of power. Include at least one reliable source to support your idea.
5) Conclusion – restate your thesis (tell me what you argued) and include information that makes your work interesting, relatable, or important.
ATTACHED: A brief explanation of the museum paper assignment
A rubric of how the papers will be graded
2 Museum Papers from earlier semesters (Exhibit A and Exhibit B)
Basically, in 900 words paper, MLA style, give marks to the 2 papers. For their content, the sources that they used (if they are appropriate or not). Most of the paper should be on one of the two papers of your choosing. In it discuss what would the writer could have added more or less to the paper. For this part, guess it would be better to talk about the paper that is not very good as it is easier to add more to a not-very-good paper. Based on the attached rubric, explain what the paper did good and what i failed to present in each of its paragraphs.
