Thank you for your initial post in this week’s discussion forum. You selected a
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
Thank you for your initial post in this week’s discussion forum. You selected a great topic. Diabetic foot ulcers are a debilitating disease. I would like to clarify whether your study is experimental or quasi-experimental. Thereafter, I would like to understand what elements of the study justified the categorization.
I am looking forward to hearing your expert opinion.
this is my discussion
The name of a paper is “Enumerate the Influence of Education Activities in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Saudi Arabia via Comprehension of the Circumstances and Self-Care Practices in Saudi Arabia.” I will look at it quickly. Diabetes mellitus is a big major issue in every country in the world (Miller, 2020). Medical practitioners have difficulty treating ulcers on the feet of people with diabetes. There are main reasons diabetic foot ulcers do not heal: control of blood sugar, oxygen flow, smoking, diet, and a problem with the wound itself. The exercise aims to determine how well education settings help people understand their condition and care for themselves, so they do not get diabetic foot ulcers. The researcher employed a strategy that was very similar to an experiment. The study was conducted in 2016 at Umulj General Hospital’s Internal Health Division and Ambulatory Clinic.
There were 65 persons with type 2 diabetes in the research. Both the Ministry of Healthcare and the University of Tabuk Research Quality Commission approved the study. Male or female individuals who have had type 2 diabetes for more than five years and between the ages of nineteen and sixty-five are eligible (Mohamed, 2018). Patients with gastroparesis, orthostatic hypotension, and hypoglycemic unawareness, autonomic neuropathy, as well as those who are mentally ill or have hearing or vision problems, are not allowed to participate in the study. Two groups of patients were chosen at random to take part. The first group (n = 30) got an educational program with guidelines and information about its operations.
The second group (n = 30) was the randomized trial. The people in the control group got normal care at the hospital. The following statistical tools were used to get the data required for the study: The study was done in three stages: pre-study, execution, and examination. The first tool was a patient evaluation (Miller, 2020). The second tool was a constructed nursing intervention proper procedure. The third tool was a participant observation guidebook for foot care. The study and regulated participants demonstrated a strong link between how much a patient knew about diabetes, how they treated it, and how much schooling they had.
The research concluded that when the training program was implemented, patients’ awareness, ability to care for their feet and degree of patient knowledge and understanding all got a lot better. A lack of high-quality data often makes it hard to use quasi-experimental methods. If there are no baseline data, any strategy put in place after a program or policy has ended is likely to fail in a big way (Miller, 2020). Because quasi-experimental methodologies are based on definite assumptions, the conclusions about what caused something to happen are less certain than those from a well-run randomized controlled trial (RCT). On the other side, quasi-experimental initiatives are frequently positively received by decision designers if they are accomplished well enough and presented straightforwardly.
References
Miller, C. J., Smith, S. N., & Pugatch, M. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112452.
Mohamed, N., & Kersha, R. (2018). Evaluate the Effect of Education Interventions in the Prevention of Diabetic Foot Ulcers through Knowledge of the Disease and Self-Care Practices in Saudi Arabia. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(11), 2206–2213. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.439
